Another poster earlier asked for people to provide proof of God’s existence. Of course, so many people thought it would be clever to demand the poster to prove that there is no God. Sorry, but the burden of proof rests on those who making a positive assertion–not on those making a negative one.
Reversing the burden of proof is a logical fallacy because, first, it requires proof of a negative, and second, it places the burden of proof on the challenger, not the proposer of the idea. Before a claim is made, it should be proven, not asserted until disproven.
If I told you that there are invisible fairies in my garden that make my flowers grow, wouldn’t you want proof of this? Now imagine if I turned around and said, “You can’t prove that the fairies AREN’T there; therefore, my point still stands, and there are fairies in my garden making the flowers grow!” Would you accept my reasoning? Maybe if you were insane and lacked critical thinking skills.
In conclusion, shut up.
“Yet, as an Atheist the assertion of “no god” is a positive.”
Your mother must have been an alcoholic while she was pregnant with you. I’m terribly sorry that the resulting mental impairment has led to you being unable to understand how the word “no” is used to create a negative assertion.
